The evolution of the web – Guest Author, Runar Karlsen

The evolution of the web.
A look at globalist corporations shaping of the web.

Censoring the web
No other thing has been so detrimental to the cause of the NWO conspirators. The web have been the illumination for the world, not the illuminati. Now the Illuminati obviously is just something ill-uminating. And they are known to not like so much freedom of speech, so how will they continue co-operate with the web? Many people expect some greater censorship to occur. In 2006 there was some censorship plans signed by Donald Rumsfeld, which came out to be nothing. Later the NSA surveillance were exposed, and that looks more like their chosen plan. However it will never work as a crackdown on people who chose honest and legal ways.
And their nightmare is that there appears some true candidate for the people with understanding of money and who acknowledge their war against Humanity and retaliates. Arrests the rubble of the many Rothschild families and give them precious guilloutine time.
This would be fair, and they know it so well, therefore must they be prepared for anything. And they are known to work the case from every side and angle – all efforts contribute – at least in being prepared. They understand they are likely to be taken down the way they didn’t consider.
The hate laws are an important part of their new game, and it seems now to develope. These laws have been forced upon countries by EU and UN, and do have as its covert main purpose to defend Jews and their vice cultures from critic. People should react more to these laws, not just for being a offense to sovereignty, but for they being discriminatory in essence. They do favor certain groups and defend them from natural response, while the criminal responses which they pretend to outlaw are already criminalized by existing laws on injury, libel etc.

Now Cameron comes along with part 2 of hate laws.
The war against terror shall be expanded to include extremists. While hinting slightly to muslim extremists, the new bill shall of course be for all, and it will be announced in the Queens coming speech.
The formulations so far goes :
“The measures would give the police powers to apply to the high court for an order to limit the “harmful activities” of an extremist individual. The definition of harmful is to include a risk of public disorder, a risk of harassment, alarm or distress or creating a “threat to the functioning of democracy”.”

And this is the long awaited reaction to Muslim crime in UK. The murder of Lee Rigby is mentioned.
First these politicians get them over with their violations of civilization, for thereby use them to limit the existing freedom for everyone. But the worst is the muddy formulations of the law, such as “Being a risk”. Any politician should be incarcerated for trying to introduce such violations to the spirit of law.

More censorship is expected to fight anti-semitism or relevant political information as it should be called, but it might backfire. It is not a Jesuit monitored project, it is pretty agressive. I would guess there are lots of Chabad Jews in this movement. It bears their kind of rafinement.
It may backfire as it becomes too visible who wants to be categorized Holy and have sanctuary peace, in the society of social unrest which increasingly more people understand is created by them.

But this is all top level deformation of the web, there are other structures possible to mess or shape if having tools of mass-economy.

Corporative shaping of the web
The area of interest for the NWO managers are not just the press, remember the phrasing in the Marxist ten point scheme, “The centralization of all communication”. Thats how the true monopolists regard it. Still to minimize somewhat – the area of interest could be called the Industry of opinion.
This would contain what already have seen they have taken care of. The Press, Book publishing, incl. educative books and entertainment, in particular film industry.
The newcomers with the web are comment section in newspapers – these are easily managed and usually quietly censored by the paper itself. It is common that newspapers want commentators to login by real name. They have no moral right to do so, as the NWO newspapers do always have anonymous owners.

Third party parttakers in commenting.
Another factor in the comment sections, also extending to the blogsphere is Disqus.
They get some relevant critic here: Lee Brayden hits Disqus Disqus issues -top 5 bothersome.

And then there was all the public forums which flourished 1995-2002. Email-lists. These debate forums was very popular and also interesting those days, and then suddenly the buy up frenzy began together with the dotcom bubble blowing and they ended all up at Yahoo, where they became neglected by these owners and started to disappear in spam, random eradication and arrogant hosting. It was a slow but effective end for that boom of making up minds. Was it deliberate? I now start to wonder. They have also bought up, the photosharing site which excels in commenting and networking. Their hosting have received lethal critic, but the yahoo stocks still do well. Flickr maybe doesn’t count much in the Yahoo economy.
But remember whenever such corporations shows outright hostility for its customers, there is space for competition. 2010 2013
After the e-mail lists became outfashioned, there came a new wave of public forums, set up by private incentive, using scripting like php, making it a very professional act. These didn’t work very well even if some did. To create a lively forum, human engines are needed, somebody who cares and updates the site with news and themes to discuss. This is the success formula of newspapers. That people knows it is being updated.
Forums are very important part of humanity’s mind.

Herding is a phenomena usually found under different names within marketing section, but we should be aware that effective herding online may reduce the NWO need of censoring. AOL is the corp behind the first great herding online.
Here we see the idea of the Internet castle come to life, the great online Mall where you have all things you could need in reach. A parallel web with borders and limitations set by the corp.
Facebook is now the great online Castle, which I never joined. I hear now of social pressure, also political pressure being forced in diverse manners. I am surprised to learn about their pay-to-share practise, meaning you have to pay to reach the full amount of friends and contacts with your posts, otherwise they will randomly cut off recipients. As far as i understand this, you cannot use facebook any longer for invitations to your birthday party as your regular mass invitation will be limited by them. But their stocks are rising. And they are a NWO dream come true. buy facebook likes !
Hooray, In the age of alternative currencies, buy quasi currency! Feel good again.
There are alternatives to facebook, A new one is

Web piracy
Lastly, communities hosted by corporations may also experience the synergy created by the former pirates of the web. It is becoming unsafe to be an individual operator, because there are hackers around, and the need to form communities like Cloudflare arises. These are protecting against cyber attacks which is a good idea, but why should’t an ordinary isp provider or web hotel fix any such problems? It is a question of now needing more expertice to operate online, and the corporate solution may be what seems to be the comfort zone to very many. Listen and repeat to yourself : “Corporate peace is better peace, tested and customized for sheep”.
We see the street reality of paying protection money is approaching.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s